Marie Landry Spy Shop
← All Files Library statsThis document is an official Amended Statement of Claim filed in the Federal Court under Court File Number T-2559-26. The legal proceeding is between Jean-Yves Landry, also known as Marie-Soleil Seshat Landry, who is acting as the self-represented plaintiff and responding party, and His Majesty the King, serving as the defendant and moving party. The document outlines a civil action seeking substantial financial compensation and constitutional declarations due to administrative errors made by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police regarding criminal record management. The primary purpose of the claim is to address the severe consequences stemming from false conviction entries maintained on the Canadian Police Information Centre database for nearly a decade following the formal withdrawal of criminal charges.
The action is structured into several detailed sections, beginning with the specific relief sought by the plaintiff. The plaintiff requests a formal declaration under section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that the defendant infringed upon rights protected under sections 7, 9, and 11(e) of the Charter. In addition to these constitutional declarations, the claim demands two million five hundred thousand dollars in general damages for negligence, misfeasance in public office, and constitutional breaches, along with seven hundred fifty thousand dollars in aggravated damages and two hundred fifty thousand dollars in punitive damages. The plaintiff also claims pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the Federal Courts Act, alongside any further relief the court considers just.
The document identifies specific Crown servants whose conduct forms the basis of the litigation. These include the court section employees at the Codiac Regional RCMP Detachment in Moncton, New Brunswick, who were responsible for logging court dispositions and incorrectly entering the October 31, 2016 disposition into RCMP files. Furthermore, the claim targets the records custodians responsible for the accuracy and maintenance of PROS and CPIC records between October 2016 and July 2025, as well as the reviewing officers from the J Division Professional Responsibility Unit and Criminal Operations who reviewed file 2016-84414 in 2023.
The material facts section details the complete history of the case, starting with the opening of occurrence file 2016-84414 on January 22, 2016, which charged the plaintiff with an indecent act under section 173(1)(b) and assault under section 266 of the Criminal Code. On October 31, 2016, before Judge Jolène M. Richard in the Provincial Court of New Brunswick at Moncton, Crown Prosecutor Éric Lalonde withdrew both charges without any finding of guilt or guilty plea. Despite this withdrawal, a court section employee erroneously recorded the disposition as guilty convictions on both counts within PROS and CPIC, databases relied upon heavily by police, prosecutors, and criminal courts during bail hearings and judicial assessments.
The consequences of these database errors were profound and long-lasting. The false indecent act conviction remained active in CPIC for 2,373 days until May 2023, while the false assault conviction persisted for 3,195 days until July 2025. Between late 2016 and 2021, the plaintiff appeared on subsequent provincial court matters, where prosecutors and judges were consistently supplied with CPIC records displaying active convictions for violent and sexual offenses. The plaintiff asserts that these false entries directly prejudiced her liberty analysis under sections 515(10)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code, resulting in pre-trial detention and assessment remands totaling approximately one thousand days. Although senior RCMP officials, including S/Sgt. Chantal Roger and Assistant Commissioner DeAnna L. Hill, acknowledged the administrative error in writing in late 2023, the false assault conviction was maintained in the database for an additional twenty months.
The legal causes of action brought forward in the claim encompass negligence, misfeasance in public office, and constitutional infringements. The plaintiff argues that the records custodians and court section employees breached their duty of care by logging withdrawn charges as convictions and failing to audit the records for nearly nine years. Moreover, the claim asserts that reviewing officers and records custodians engaged in misfeasance in public office by knowingly maintaining the false assault conviction on CPIC long after discovering the error in 2023. Finally, the supply of false conviction records to criminal courts is argued to have breached the plaintiff's right to liberty under section 7, subjected her to arbitrary detention under section 9, and denied her reasonable bail under section 11(e) of the Charter.
To substantiate these claims, the document provides an extensive appendix detailing a master chronology of provincial court dates, file numbers, presiding judges, proceedings, orders, and the direct impact of active CPIC status during each court appearance from 2016 to 2025. This comprehensive record covers numerous court dates before various judges where custody and assessment orders were influenced by the false conviction background. Researchers, legal professionals, human rights advocates, and individuals studying systemic administrative errors within law enforcement databases will find this document exceptionally useful for understanding the real-world legal and personal ramifications of faulty police record management.
Readers can review this legal pleading to understand how administrative errors in police databases impact judicial proceedings. It serves as a comprehensive reference for claims involving negligence, public office misfeasance, and Charter violations. Researchers and legal professionals can analyze the detailed chronology in Appendix A to study the effects of false CPIC records on pre-trial detention.
| Filename | Amended_Statement_of_Claim_-_Landry_v_HMK__T-2559-26_.pdf |
| Category | document |
| File Size | 268.0 KB |
| Format | |
| Uploaded | Nov 7, 2026 |
| Views (people) | 0 |
The court file number is T-2559-26 in the Federal Court.
The plaintiff claims negligence, misfeasance in public office, and infringements of sections 7, 9, and 11(e) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The false assault conviction remained active in CPIC for 3,195 days, being deleted by the RCMP in July 2025.
The plaintiff seeks $2,500,000 in general and constitutional damages, $750,000 in aggravated damages, and $250,000 in punitive damages.
The error originated from the court section employees at the Codiac Regional RCMP Detachment in Moncton, New Brunswick.
Loading comments…
